WEEK 9 · Thu, Nov 5, 6:15 PM CST

Jacksonville Jaguars @ Baltimore Ravens

9 qualified model plays · 7 modeled lines did not qualify · 0 graded - 9 pending
← Back to Week 9
MODEL OVERVIEW

What the board is seeing

Qualified plays 9 Published sides that cleared the current model thresholds.
Avg model win 72.2% Average estimated win probability across this game's qualified plays.
Avg no-vig edge +24.1% Model probability minus the market's no-vig implied probability.
Avg model-implied EV +43.0% Average modeled return using the published side price.

Projection gap is the raw difference between PDR's projection and the sportsbook line. No-vig edge is the probability advantage after removing sportsbook hold. They answer different questions.

How the model works →
QUALIFIED PLAYS

Game prop board

Ranked by the frozen published model board.

#1 MODEL PLAY

Brian Thomas Jr.

Receiving yards
Pending
OVER 10.5
fanduel -114
Projection 61.9
Proj. gap +51.4
Model win 95.5%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +45.5%
Model-implied EV +79.3%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 61.9 is 51.4 above the 10.5 line.
Model win probability 95.5% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +45.5% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 95.5% model win, +45.5% no-vig edge, and +79.3% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#2 MODEL PLAY

Brian Thomas Jr.

Receptions
Pending
OVER 1.5
fanduel +158
Projection 4.0
Proj. gap +2.5
Model win 81.4%
No-vig market 36.2%
No-vig edge +45.2%
Model-implied EV +110.1%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 4.0 is 2.5 above the 1.5 line.
Model win probability 81.4% vs 36.2% no-vig market probability creates a +45.2% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 81.4% model win, +45.2% no-vig edge, and +110.1% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#3 MODEL PLAY

Zay Flowers

Receiving yards
Pending
OVER 47.5
fanduel -114
Projection 76.5
Proj. gap +29.0
Model win 76.7%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +26.7%
Model-implied EV +44.1%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 76.5 is 29.0 above the 47.5 line.
Model win probability 76.7% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +26.7% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 76.7% model win, +26.7% no-vig edge, and +44.1% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#4 MODEL PLAY

Derrick Henry

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 69.5
fanduel -114
Projection 100.4
Proj. gap +30.9
Model win 76.4%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +26.4%
Model-implied EV +43.4%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 100.4 is 30.9 above the 69.5 line.
Model win probability 76.4% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +26.4% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 76.4% model win, +26.4% no-vig edge, and +43.4% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#5 MODEL PLAY

Trevor Lawrence

Passing TDs
Pending
OVER 1.5
fanduel -132
Projection 2.1
Proj. gap +0.6
Model win 65.9%
No-vig market 53.2%
No-vig edge +12.7%
Model-implied EV +15.8%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 2.1 is 0.6 above the 1.5 line.
Model win probability 65.9% vs 53.2% no-vig market probability creates a +12.7% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 65.9% model win, +12.7% no-vig edge, and +15.8% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
#6 MODEL PLAY

Jakobi Meyers

Receiving yards
Pending
OVER 40.5
fanduel -114
Projection 61.8
Proj. gap +21.3
Model win 64.6%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +14.6%
Model-implied EV +21.2%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 61.8 is 21.3 above the 40.5 line.
Model win probability 64.6% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +14.6% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 64.6% model win, +14.6% no-vig edge, and +21.2% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#7 MODEL PLAY

Parker Washington

Receiving yards
Pending
OVER 63.5
fanduel -114
Projection 84.5
Proj. gap +21.0
Model win 64.0%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +14.0%
Model-implied EV +20.1%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 84.5 is 21.0 above the 63.5 line.
Model win probability 64.0% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +14.0% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 64.0% model win, +14.0% no-vig edge, and +20.1% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#8 MODEL PLAY

Jakobi Meyers

Receptions
Pending
OVER 3.5
fanduel +116
Projection 5.1
Proj. gap +1.6
Model win 63.9%
No-vig market 43.3%
No-vig edge +20.6%
Model-implied EV +38.1%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 5.1 is 1.6 above the 3.5 line.
Model win probability 63.9% vs 43.3% no-vig market probability creates a +20.6% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 63.9% model win, +20.6% no-vig edge, and +38.1% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#9 MODEL PLAY

Trevor Lawrence

Passing yards
Pending
OVER 237.5
fanduel -114
Projection 268.5
Proj. gap +31.0
Model win 61.4%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +11.4%
Model-implied EV +15.3%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 268.5 is 31.0 above the 237.5 line.
Model win probability 61.4% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +11.4% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 61.4% model win, +11.4% no-vig edge, and +15.3% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Other lines PDR reviewed

Context only. These are not published recommendations and are not graded.

MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Brenton Strange

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 3.5
fanduel -122
Projection3.6
Proj. gap+0.1
Model win37.2%
No-vig market51.4%
No-vig edge-14.2%
Model-implied EV-32.2%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Brenton Strange

Receiving yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 35.5
fanduel -114
Projection38.0
Proj. gap+2.5
Model win36.6%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-13.4%
Model-implied EV-31.2%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Mark Andrews

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 2.5
fanduel -130
Projection2.7
Proj. gap+0.2
Model win39.1%
No-vig market52.8%
No-vig edge-13.7%
Model-implied EV-30.8%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Mark Andrews

Receiving yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 18.5
fanduel -114
Projection24.3
Proj. gap+5.8
Model win40.8%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-9.2%
Model-implied EV-23.4%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Parker Washington

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 4.5
fanduel -102
Projection5.0
Proj. gap+0.5
Model win44.4%
No-vig market47.2%
No-vig edge-2.8%
Model-implied EV-12.0%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Trevor Lawrence

Rushing yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 12.5
fanduel -114
Projection23.4
Proj. gap+10.9
Model win49.6%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-0.4%
Model-implied EV-6.8%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 796
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Zay Flowers

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 4.5
fanduel +128
Projection4.8
Proj. gap+0.3
Model win41.0%
No-vig market41.0%
No-vig edge+0.1%
Model-implied EV-6.4%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154