WEEK 10 · Mon, Nov 16, 7:15 PM CST

Los Angeles Chargers @ Baltimore Ravens

8 qualified model plays · 5 modeled lines did not qualify · 0 graded - 8 pending
← Back to Week 10
MODEL OVERVIEW

What the board is seeing

Qualified plays 8 Published sides that cleared the current model thresholds.
Avg model win 67.5% Average estimated win probability across this game's qualified plays.
Avg no-vig edge +19.5% Model probability minus the market's no-vig implied probability.
Avg model-implied EV +33.7% Average modeled return using the published side price.

Projection gap is the raw difference between PDR's projection and the sportsbook line. No-vig edge is the probability advantage after removing sportsbook hold. They answer different questions.

How the model works →
QUALIFIED PLAYS

Game prop board

Ranked by the frozen published model board.

#1 MODEL PLAY

Derrick Henry

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 77.5
fanduel -114
Projection 105.5
Proj. gap +28.0
Model win 73.6%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +23.6%
Model-implied EV +38.2%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 105.5 is 28.0 above the 77.5 line.
Model win probability 73.6% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +23.6% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 73.6% model win, +23.6% no-vig edge, and +38.2% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#2 MODEL PLAY

Omarion Hampton

Receptions
Pending
OVER 1.5
fanduel +154
Projection 3.5
Proj. gap +2.0
Model win 73.4%
No-vig market 36.8%
No-vig edge +36.7%
Model-implied EV +86.5%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 3.5 is 2.0 above the 1.5 line.
Model win probability 73.4% vs 36.8% no-vig market probability creates a +36.7% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 73.4% model win, +36.7% no-vig edge, and +86.5% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#3 MODEL PLAY

Zay Flowers

Receptions
Pending
UNDER 5.5
fanduel -102
Projection 4.9
Proj. gap -0.6
Model win 72.7%
No-vig market 47.2%
No-vig edge +25.5%
Model-implied EV +43.9%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 4.9 is 0.6 below the 5.5 line.
Model win probability 72.7% vs 47.2% no-vig market probability creates a +25.5% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 72.7% model win, +25.5% no-vig edge, and +43.9% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#4 MODEL PLAY

Keaton Mitchell

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 9.5
fanduel -114
Projection 32.8
Proj. gap +23.3
Model win 67.8%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +17.8%
Model-implied EV +27.3%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 32.8 is 23.3 above the 9.5 line.
Model win probability 67.8% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +17.8% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 67.8% model win, +17.8% no-vig edge, and +27.3% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#5 MODEL PLAY

Justin Herbert

Passing yards
Pending
OVER 208.5
fanduel -114
Projection 249.3
Proj. gap +40.8
Model win 66.5%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +16.5%
Model-implied EV +24.8%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 249.3 is 40.8 above the 208.5 line.
Model win probability 66.5% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +16.5% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 66.5% model win, +16.5% no-vig edge, and +24.8% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
#6 MODEL PLAY

Kimani Vidal

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 18.5
fanduel -114
Projection 40.5
Proj. gap +22.0
Model win 65.5%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +15.5%
Model-implied EV +22.9%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 40.5 is 22.0 above the 18.5 line.
Model win probability 65.5% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +15.5% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 65.5% model win, +15.5% no-vig edge, and +22.9% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#7 MODEL PLAY

Omarion Hampton

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 32.5
fanduel -114
Projection 51.4
Proj. gap +18.9
Model win 60.9%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +10.9%
Model-implied EV +14.4%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 51.4 is 18.9 above the 32.5 line.
Model win probability 60.9% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +10.9% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 60.9% model win, +10.9% no-vig edge, and +14.4% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#8 MODEL PLAY

Omarion Hampton

Receiving yards
Pending
OVER 4.5
fanduel -114
Projection 22.2
Proj. gap +17.7
Model win 59.6%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +9.6%
Model-implied EV +11.9%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 22.2 is 17.7 above the 4.5 line.
Model win probability 59.6% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +9.6% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 59.6% model win, +9.6% no-vig edge, and +11.9% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Other lines PDR reviewed

Context only. These are not published recommendations and are not graded.

MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Justin Herbert

Passing TDs
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 0.5
fanduel -270
Projection1.4
Proj. gap+0.9
Model win71.9%
No-vig market68.2%
No-vig edge+3.7%
Model-implied EV-1.5%
Why it did not qualify: No-vig market edge did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 516
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Justin Herbert

Rushing yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 20.5
fanduel -114
Projection28.8
Proj. gap+8.3
Model win46.2%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-3.8%
Model-implied EV-13.2%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 796
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Mark Andrews

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 2.5
fanduel -114
Projection2.6
Proj. gap+0.1
Model win37.7%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-12.3%
Model-implied EV-29.1%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Mark Andrews

Receiving yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 19.5
fanduel -114
Projection22.5
Proj. gap+3.0
Model win37.3%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge-12.7%
Model-implied EV-30.0%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Zay Flowers

Receiving yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 69.5
fanduel -114
Projection81.9
Proj. gap+12.4
Model win51.3%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge+1.3%
Model-implied EV-3.8%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154