WEEK 9 · Sun, Nov 8, 2:05 PM CST

Las Vegas Raiders @ San Francisco 49ers

9 qualified model plays · 3 modeled lines did not qualify · 0 graded - 9 pending
← Back to Week 9
MODEL OVERVIEW

What the board is seeing

Qualified plays 9 Published sides that cleared the current model thresholds.
Avg model win 74.1% Average estimated win probability across this game's qualified plays.
Avg no-vig edge +23.5% Model probability minus the market's no-vig implied probability.
Avg model-implied EV +37.2% Average modeled return using the published side price.

Projection gap is the raw difference between PDR's projection and the sportsbook line. No-vig edge is the probability advantage after removing sportsbook hold. They answer different questions.

How the model works →
QUALIFIED PLAYS

Game prop board

Ranked by the frozen published model board.

#1 MODEL PLAY

Brock Bowers

Receiving yards
Pending
UNDER 76.5
fanduel -114
Projection 47.2
Proj. gap -29.3
Model win 88.1%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +38.1%
Model-implied EV +65.3%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 47.2 is 29.3 below the 76.5 line.
Model win probability 88.1% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +38.1% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 88.1% model win, +38.1% no-vig edge, and +65.3% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#2 MODEL PLAY

Ashton Jeanty

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 25.5
fanduel -114
Projection 64.2
Proj. gap +38.7
Model win 86.1%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +36.1%
Model-implied EV +61.5%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 64.2 is 38.7 above the 25.5 line.
Model win probability 86.1% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +36.1% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 86.1% model win, +36.1% no-vig edge, and +61.5% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#3 MODEL PLAY

Brock Bowers

Receptions
Pending
UNDER 6.5
fanduel -114
Projection 4.7
Proj. gap -1.8
Model win 85.2%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +35.2%
Model-implied EV +60.0%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 4.7 is 1.8 below the 6.5 line.
Model win probability 85.2% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +35.2% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 85.2% model win, +35.2% no-vig edge, and +60.0% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#4 MODEL PLAY

Ashton Jeanty

Receptions
Pending
UNDER 4.5
fanduel -148
Projection 2.8
Proj. gap -1.7
Model win 84.0%
No-vig market 55.9%
No-vig edge +28.2%
Model-implied EV +40.8%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 2.8 is 1.7 below the 4.5 line.
Model win probability 84.0% vs 55.9% no-vig market probability creates a +28.2% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 84.0% model win, +28.2% no-vig edge, and +40.8% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#5 MODEL PLAY

Ashton Jeanty

Receiving yards
Pending
UNDER 33.5
fanduel -114
Projection 24.5
Proj. gap -9.0
Model win 74.8%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +24.8%
Model-implied EV +40.5%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 24.5 is 9.0 below the 33.5 line.
Model win probability 74.8% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +24.8% edge.
Qualified with 2154 residual samples, 74.8% model win, +24.8% no-vig edge, and +40.5% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 2154
#6 MODEL PLAY

Kirk Cousins

Passing yards
Pending
UNDER 250.5
fanduel -114
Projection 216.4
Proj. gap -34.1
Model win 66.5%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +16.5%
Model-implied EV +24.8%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 216.4 is 34.1 below the 250.5 line.
Model win probability 66.5% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +16.5% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 66.5% model win, +16.5% no-vig edge, and +24.8% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
#7 MODEL PLAY

Brock Purdy

Passing yards
Pending
UNDER 245.5
fanduel -114
Projection 219.4
Proj. gap -26.1
Model win 63.2%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +13.2%
Model-implied EV +18.6%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 219.4 is 26.1 below the 245.5 line.
Model win probability 63.2% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +13.2% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 63.2% model win, +13.2% no-vig edge, and +18.6% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
#8 MODEL PLAY

Christian McCaffrey

Rushing yards
Pending
OVER 60.5
fanduel -114
Projection 79.2
Proj. gap +18.7
Model win 60.7%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +10.7%
Model-implied EV +13.9%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 79.2 is 18.7 above the 60.5 line.
Model win probability 60.7% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +10.7% edge.
Qualified with 796 residual samples, 60.7% model win, +10.7% no-vig edge, and +13.9% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 796
#9 MODEL PLAY

Kirk Cousins

Passing TDs
Pending
UNDER 1.5
fanduel -112
Projection 1.3
Proj. gap -0.2
Model win 57.9%
No-vig market 49.4%
No-vig edge +8.6%
Model-implied EV +9.7%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 1.3 is 0.2 below the 1.5 line.
Model win probability 57.9% vs 49.4% no-vig market probability creates a +8.6% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 57.9% model win, +8.6% no-vig edge, and +9.7% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Other lines PDR reviewed

Context only. These are not published recommendations and are not graded.

MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Brock Purdy

Passing TDs
Did not qualify
Model side: UNDER 2.5
fanduel -180
Projection2.4
Proj. gap-0.1
Model win55.2%
No-vig market60.1%
No-vig edge-4.8%
Model-implied EV-14.1%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 516
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Tre Tucker

Receptions
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 3.5
fanduel -102
Projection4.1
Proj. gap+0.6
Model win47.0%
No-vig market47.2%
No-vig edge-0.2%
Model-implied EV-7.0%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Tre Tucker

Receiving yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 44.5
fanduel -114
Projection56.3
Proj. gap+11.8
Model win50.2%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge+0.2%
Model-implied EV-5.7%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 2154