WEEK 2 · Sun, Sep 20, 12:00 PM CDT

Cincinnati Bengals @ Houston Texans

2 qualified model plays · 2 modeled lines did not qualify · 1-1-0
← Back to Week 2
MODEL OVERVIEW

What the board is seeing

Qualified plays 2 Published sides that cleared the current model thresholds.
Avg model win 72.9% Average estimated win probability across this game's qualified plays.
Avg no-vig edge +22.6% Model probability minus the market's no-vig implied probability.
Avg model-implied EV +35.6% Average modeled return using the published side price.

Projection gap is the raw difference between PDR's projection and the sportsbook line. No-vig edge is the probability advantage after removing sportsbook hold. They answer different questions.

How the model works →
QUALIFIED PLAYS

Game prop board

Ranked by the frozen published model board.

#1 MODEL PLAY

Joe Burrow

Passing TDs
WIN
OVER 1.5
fanduel -118
Projection 2.6
Proj. gap +1.1
Model win 78.1%
No-vig market 50.6%
No-vig edge +27.5%
Model-implied EV +44.3%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 2.6 is 1.1 above the 1.5 line.
Model win probability 78.1% vs 50.6% no-vig market probability creates a +27.5% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 78.1% model win, +27.5% no-vig edge, and +44.3% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
Final: 2 passing TDs
#2 MODEL PLAY

C.J. Stroud

Passing yards
LOSS
UNDER 240.5
fanduel -114
Projection 205.5
Proj. gap -35.0
Model win 67.6%
No-vig market 50.0%
No-vig edge +17.6%
Model-implied EV +27.0%
WHY THIS PLAY
Projection 205.5 is 35.0 below the 240.5 line.
Model win probability 67.6% vs 50.0% no-vig market probability creates a +17.6% edge.
Qualified with 516 residual samples, 67.6% model win, +17.6% no-vig edge, and +27.0% model-implied EV; publication floors are 500 samples, 57.5% win, +5.0% edge, and +5.0% EV.
Historical residual sample: 516
Final: 353 passing yards
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Other lines PDR reviewed

Context only. These are not published recommendations and are not graded.

MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

C.J. Stroud

Passing TDs
Did not qualify
Model side: UNDER 1.5
fanduel -122
Projection1.5
Proj. gap-0.0
Model win54.8%
No-vig market51.4%
No-vig edge+3.4%
Model-implied EV-0.2%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 516
MODELED - DID NOT QUALIFY

Joe Burrow

Passing yards
Did not qualify
Model side: OVER 247.5
fanduel -114
Projection256.5
Proj. gap+9.0
Model win52.9%
No-vig market50.0%
No-vig edge+2.9%
Model-implied EV-0.7%
Why it did not qualify: Model win probability did not clear the publication floor.
Historical residual sample: 516